Scan barcode
seforana's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Body horror, Confinement, Death, Gore, Mental illness, Rape, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Kidnapping, Grief, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Murder, Alcohol, Sexual harassment, War, and Injury/Injury detail
nziam's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Violence, Sexual harassment, and War
Moderate: Animal death, Sexual assault, Sexual violence, and Vomit
celestialjeu's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Gore, Violence, and Murder
Moderate: Sexual assault, Sexual content, and Sexual harassment
bannedfrombookclub's review against another edition
4.0
It's a book where the narrator is not the protagonist, though Hellena might grow into that role in the later books. The story is about Vonvalt, a kind of romano-germanic Judge Dredd with some low-magic whose authority and morality are tested by those who would remake the empire in their image.
Another interesting aspect is that this is a battle to maintain law and civilization that's under threat from religious fundamentalists, rather than the usual over throw of an evil emperor shtick. So it's very much in conversation with modern events in the West.
It's also a female narrator written by a man, and I'll give this an 7/8 out of 10 on that front. Don't know if I should add or remove points for the reverse fridging of her love interest, a romantic connection that felt flat and forced in any case.
Graphic: Violence, Religious bigotry, Murder, and War
Moderate: Sexual harassment
Minor: Sexual assault
fran's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Gore, Murder, and War
Moderate: Rape, Sexual assault, and Sexual harassment
Minor: Alcoholism, Animal death, Body horror, Child death, Confinement, Death, Sexism, Blood, Excrement, Medical content, Kidnapping, Grief, and Death of parent
wishbea's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Graphic: Cursing, Violence, and Murder
Moderate: Animal death, Confinement, Death, Grief, Death of parent, Cultural appropriation, Alcohol, and Sexual harassment
Minor: Alcoholism, Child death, Rape, Sexual content, Torture, and Fire/Fire injury
mikarala's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
First of all, I really enjoyed the world-building. This is a relatively low-fantasy world, and up until the climax I probably wouldn't have called it quite grimdark, as the world was a little too...orderly. Honestly, it really strongly reminded me of the world in the middle school/YA series The Rangers Apprentice, which is not super glamorous, but also doesn't reach the bleak levels of some more notable crapsack worlds, such as ASOIAF or First Law. However, things did get fairly gory near the end, so it's probably somewhere between neutral to fairly dark. But anyways, not the point.
I found this novel did very good job of developing the world without overwhelming the reader with exposition. There's maybe a page near the start that was a little heavy-handed in that regard, but overall I think the author managed to slowly build up the world naturally through the narrative. The narrative, of course, is centered on a Justice of the Sovan Empire, who travels from town to town dispenses justice. While magic isn't common in this universe, Justices hold a very high place in society and some use and knowledge of magic is a part of their training. As a result of this, Sir Konrad Vonvalt, our protagonist/deuteragonist, has the ability to compel people to reveal the truth and also some limited necromancy skills. This magical knowledge is a zealously guarded secret, and I really enjoyed how this became an important aspect of the plot.
I really enjoyed Vonvalt's character journey throughout this book. I picked up this book because the description gave me very strong "Ned Stark in King's Landing investigating Jon Arryn's death" vibes. However, while I do think your opinion on that story may be a good indicator for if you'll enjoy this novel, it's not really too similar. First of all, this novel takes place in a town a fair distance from the empire's capital, and as a result, the political intrigue is fairly limited. Although some political machinations still definitely form an important aspect of this story, it doesn't quite permeate the whole setting and atmosphere the way it does in Game of Thrones. In other words, I definitely wouldn't describe this as a political thriller.
Vonvalt is also not Ned Stark, lol. I really like him as a character, and he shares some traits, such as his belief in the law and justice, as well as his lack of political instinct. But the differences also become more clear over the course of the novel, culminating with some blunt foreshadowing
However, I can't say I feel the same about Helena, his clerk and our actual narrator. I don't think I dislike Helena, necessarily, but something about her narrative voice was frustrating to me, and I think I would identify it as my biggest/only dislike with this story. Basically, this story is told from the POV of an elderly Helena relating the adventures she lived as a 19-20yo following Vonvalt around on his journeys. This resulted in some moments where she interjects with commentary about how she realized so-and-so "in hindsight" and some heavy foreshadowing--and by this, I mean she more or less reveals some major developments, while omitting how they happen. It takes the tone of an old person assuming you have some fundamental knowledge of the historical events occuring at the time of the story and their subsequent outcomes. Personally, this really took me out of the story and was something I didn't enjoy. I felt like it really detracted from the immediacy of the action and lessened the overall tension when things were happening in the natural course of the narrative and the older Helena sort of stepped back to offer some perspective and interpretation of her actions at the time. Honestly, something about it almost seemed genre dissonant, like this narrative technique belonged more in a historical fiction or lit fic book, idk. In any case, I did find it to be a distraction that lessened my enjoyment of the story.
That being said, I still think this is a really good book and a very strong first entry for a trilogy.
Graphic: Death, Gore, Rape, Violence, and Sexual harassment
No actual rape, but threat of rape discussed and fairly immediate at points in novel.prynne31's review against another edition
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
Graphic: Death, Gore, Violence, Blood, Police brutality, Medical content, Murder, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Animal death, Child death, Confinement, Torture, Excrement, Vomit, Grief, Religious bigotry, Medical trauma, Death of parent, Sexual harassment, Colonisation, and Classism
Necromancy