Take a photo of a barcode or cover
4.26 AVERAGE
4.26 AVERAGE
This book examines how inequality has been justified over the past three centuries or so. One of Piketty's most interesting insights is that a certain ideology has replicated inequality across different times and regions. This is what he calls the tri-functional scheme whereby clergy and nobility control the majority economic resources to the detriment of everybody else found at least in past European and Indian societies. However, this scheme has been replicated in contemporary UK, France, and USA where traditional left parties have come to represent the educated (c.f. clergy) and the right have come to represent the well-off (c.f. nobility) leaving a significant proportional of the electorates disenfranchised. But this phenomenon is not universal, other countries such as India, traditionally dominated by the tri-functional scheme are becoming politically split down traditional left-right spectrum as were western nations in the post-war years.
Piketty's sympathies are obviously quite left-wing. Piketty thus devotes a significant proportion of the book to explaining why the post-war social democratic movement has begun deteriorated post-1980. Piketty attributes this to the fall of communism as well as the failure to advance a number of policy areas such as progressive income and wealth taxes, international cooperation, co-management models. Indeed, perhaps Piketty's second most interesting insight is that a just social democratic society needs to get the balance right between a plurality of redistribution, cooperation, and power-sharing measures.
I initially wanted to read this book just for the conclusions Piketty would draw from his analysis for contemporary political and economic arrangements, but I must say that the historical approach of the book was invaluable. Piketty's historical approach really shines light on the contingent justifications for inequality in our own day and illustrates the possibilities available to us for reorganising our own societies. Obviously, this is a long book at over 1000 pages, it does get a little repetitive at times, but sometimes this repetition is helpful and I definitely wouldn't recommend skipping to the final chapters of the book.
Piketty's sympathies are obviously quite left-wing. Piketty thus devotes a significant proportion of the book to explaining why the post-war social democratic movement has begun deteriorated post-1980. Piketty attributes this to the fall of communism as well as the failure to advance a number of policy areas such as progressive income and wealth taxes, international cooperation, co-management models. Indeed, perhaps Piketty's second most interesting insight is that a just social democratic society needs to get the balance right between a plurality of redistribution, cooperation, and power-sharing measures.
I initially wanted to read this book just for the conclusions Piketty would draw from his analysis for contemporary political and economic arrangements, but I must say that the historical approach of the book was invaluable. Piketty's historical approach really shines light on the contingent justifications for inequality in our own day and illustrates the possibilities available to us for reorganising our own societies. Obviously, this is a long book at over 1000 pages, it does get a little repetitive at times, but sometimes this repetition is helpful and I definitely wouldn't recommend skipping to the final chapters of the book.
challenging
informative
slow-paced
adventurous
challenging
hopeful
informative
inspiring
slow-paced
This is an incredible book. At the end I feel … enlightened, definitely. Kinda inspired, too — his analyses and proposals in the last few chapters, coming on the back of all the previous stuff is dizzyingly brilliant, albeit tentative outlines and pointers towards further collective deliberation. I REALLY enjoyed it — kinda thrilled by it, actually … the vision of a more just society it proposes is thrilling, invigorating, effervescent — one that embraces … and then transcends capitalism. Really brilliant. (edited)
challenging
informative
slow-paced
challenging
informative
inspiring
Holy! I am seriously surprised this didn't take me 2 years to read. What a brick! The book is good, a good read if you want to learn about inequality and how dubious Ronald Reagan's reforms were.
Also good as a self defense weapon
Also good as a self defense weapon
Kind of in awe right now. This book is super all-encompassing, includes SO MUCH history and data that it’s hard to argue with its conclusions, and has a satisfying conclusion, with a lot of great proposals that make a lot of sense. I’m on board with Piketty (though if you know me you’d know that’s not a surprise).
Five stars. Would give it six if I could. This book is a must read.
Five stars. Would give it six if I could. This book is a must read.
Holy shit, I can't believe it. After 8 months, I'm finally done. Piketty is undoubtably a genius, but this book was perhaps a bit too ambitious. As he says, the purpose is not to provide end-all solutions to inequality regimes, but to spark debate about how they can be resolved. This book does an admirable job of doing so, but can be so much of a slog at times that it's probably better just to read a brief summary and do further reading on sections of interest.
R.I.P to my cat's favorite book to nap on.
R.I.P to my cat's favorite book to nap on.
challenging
hopeful
informative
slow-paced
informative
inspiring
reflective
slow-paced