Scan barcode
davidzam92's review against another edition
adventurous
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
4.0
robinofthehood's review against another edition
3.0
Really cool and unsettling concept that kept getting undermined by all the anti-Black racism
greatzarkwon's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.0
plyn's review against another edition
dark
reflective
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.75
Moderate: Animal cruelty
doughtah's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
4.0
I had a fun and creepy time reading this book. A longer review to come perhaps. But, if someone enjoys horror, I think another reader would enjoy this book.
thoughton98's review against another edition
4.0
H. G. Wells has a writing style that I find guiltily addictive to read; there is always the perfect balance between detailed realism and sci-fi imagination, and the plot of ‘The Island of Dr Moreau’ is no exception. This is a tale of cruelty, enslavement, control of the psyche and obsession, which eventually results in the collapse of humanity and reversion to primal instincts. Whilst I think I have enjoyed some of his other short stories and novels more (such as ‘The Country of the Blind’ and ‘The Red Room’), this is still a classic of the science fiction genre and stands as a terrifying and unique read.
leonard_gaya's review against another edition
5.0
This book stems from an idea that is at the same time thought-provoking, insane and very tangible. That is probably the reason why it is so scary. It is a classic of the victorian era, but for some reason probably not as famous as many other fictions of the “gothic” movement and indeed not as well known as a few other novels by H.G. Wells (such as [b:The Time Machine|2493|The Time Machine|H.G. Wells|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327942880s/2493.jpg|3234863], [b:The Invisible Man|17184|The Invisible Man|H.G. Wells|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1388639080s/17184.jpg|1326579] or [b:The War of the Worlds|8909|The War of the Worlds|H.G. Wells|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1320391644s/8909.jpg|3194841]). But it definitely deserves to be read again today.
The plot is rather simple: a castaway by the name of Prendick ends up on an uncharted island in the Pacific Ocean and meets the infamous Dr. Moreau and his assistant. Dr. Moreau is known for having practiced vivisection experiments some years before in London and, as a result, was excluded from the scientific community. Prendick later discovers that Moreau has been carrying on with his experiments and has created some monstrous beasts, while trying to turn animals into some wretched semblance of human beings. This discovery is planted and built up with some amount of suspense right from the first pages until it is fully exposed around the middle of the novel, in the chapter entitled “Doctor Moreau Explains”. The second part of the book is a nail-biting account of the catastrophic series of events that follow the dreadful discovery.
Obviously, “The Island of Dr. Moreau” is in the same vein as Gustav Meyrink’s [b:The Golem|99794|The Golem|Gustav Meyrink|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1387654357s/99794.jpg|96210] or Shelley’s [b:Frankenstein|18490|Frankenstein|Mary Shelley|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1381512375s/18490.jpg|4836639] (it can also evoke earlier figures like Shakespeare’s Prospero and Caliban in [b:The Tempest|12985|The Tempest|William Shakespeare|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327793692s/12985.jpg|1359590], or even Shylock’s most famous lines in [b:The Merchant of Venice|24128|The Merchant of Venice|William Shakespeare|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327871054s/24128.jpg|2682703]). It is about the hubris of men attempting to imitate God and create a human being with the help of science. The result is invariably dreadful and deadly. Wells original treatment of this theme rests upon the idea of vivisectional experiments carried on animals in an isolate place: mammals are surgically and chemically modified to look and behave as much as humans as they possibly can. But the mental distress caused by this novel lies of the fact that these attempts are always cruel, disastrous and abortive. The Isserley of [b:Under the Skin|123063|Under the Skin|Michel Faber|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1171847901s/123063.jpg|118483] is a distant relative of Moreau's creatures.
In some way, this book presages WWII’s Nazi’s “scientific” testings or even today's plausible out-of-line genetic engineering initiatives. Wells closes the book with these words: “the manufacture of monsters - an perhaps even quasi-human monsters - is within the possibilities of vivisection.” But, more deeply, perhaps, the horror lies in the fact that this fiction shows how feeble and unreal our human values are (including religious ones), and how easily men can fall back below animality.
The plot is rather simple: a castaway by the name of Prendick ends up on an uncharted island in the Pacific Ocean and meets the infamous Dr. Moreau and his assistant. Dr. Moreau is known for having practiced vivisection experiments some years before in London and, as a result, was excluded from the scientific community. Prendick later discovers that Moreau has been carrying on with his experiments and has created some monstrous beasts, while trying to turn animals into some wretched semblance of human beings. This discovery is planted and built up with some amount of suspense right from the first pages until it is fully exposed around the middle of the novel, in the chapter entitled “Doctor Moreau Explains”. The second part of the book is a nail-biting account of the catastrophic series of events that follow the dreadful discovery.
Obviously, “The Island of Dr. Moreau” is in the same vein as Gustav Meyrink’s [b:The Golem|99794|The Golem|Gustav Meyrink|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1387654357s/99794.jpg|96210] or Shelley’s [b:Frankenstein|18490|Frankenstein|Mary Shelley|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1381512375s/18490.jpg|4836639] (it can also evoke earlier figures like Shakespeare’s Prospero and Caliban in [b:The Tempest|12985|The Tempest|William Shakespeare|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327793692s/12985.jpg|1359590], or even Shylock’s most famous lines in [b:The Merchant of Venice|24128|The Merchant of Venice|William Shakespeare|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327871054s/24128.jpg|2682703]). It is about the hubris of men attempting to imitate God and create a human being with the help of science. The result is invariably dreadful and deadly. Wells original treatment of this theme rests upon the idea of vivisectional experiments carried on animals in an isolate place: mammals are surgically and chemically modified to look and behave as much as humans as they possibly can. But the mental distress caused by this novel lies of the fact that these attempts are always cruel, disastrous and abortive. The Isserley of [b:Under the Skin|123063|Under the Skin|Michel Faber|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1171847901s/123063.jpg|118483] is a distant relative of Moreau's creatures.
In some way, this book presages WWII’s Nazi’s “scientific” testings or even today's plausible out-of-line genetic engineering initiatives. Wells closes the book with these words: “the manufacture of monsters - an perhaps even quasi-human monsters - is within the possibilities of vivisection.” But, more deeply, perhaps, the horror lies in the fact that this fiction shows how feeble and unreal our human values are (including religious ones), and how easily men can fall back below animality.
joshwrose's review against another edition
5.0
Makes one realize that man likes to play god and makes one wonder how animalistic we are as a species. Very good read
theslozat's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
devermismysteris's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.5
Graphic: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Body horror, Confinement, Torture, Violence, Medical content, Medical trauma, Murder, and Injury/Injury detail